Comments on: Do You Think It Should Be Mandatory That?

By: Antonio R

Antonio R — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 08:36:59 +0000

No.

By: hey_bill

hey_bill — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 07:43:40 +0000

As far as Drugs YES schools are full of them but to say that a person with mental illness should not enter is crazy excuse the pun anycase is been researched that there is no profile for a person that shoots up schools drop out to A+ students have ether thought of or tryed to be the next gun man so as far as someone with a mental illness it don’t fly.

By: michele

michele — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 07:17:33 +0000

No.
The role of an educational institution is not to treat mental illness, it is to educate. There are provisions for the dismissal of students with documented health issues which could pose a danger to themselves or others.
The VA Tech situation is a tragedy, to be sure. However, college students are (the vast majority, anyway) technically adults. Legislating personal health care matters for adults is a slippery slope we ought not go down.
~M~

By: Wolfpack

Wolfpack — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 06:59:50 +0000

Not even safety is worth the loss of constitutional rights.
Along with the rights to bear arms, there is also a right to privacy & a right to not allow Gestapo type mental health people. I would never agree to my children or myself to being given exams by doctors I do not know.
The guy from VA Tech saw a counselor & was on medication – evil & jealousy can not be medicated.

By: fiVe

fiVe — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 06:37:20 +0000

Mental illness doesn’t make you a killer, it makes you sick. Anyone can and does commit those crimes, not just the mentally ill.
You’re ignorantly advocating a loss of freedom and invasion of privacy due to something that is not truly preventable.

By: Petey

Petey — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 06:18:21 +0000

I think you should be tested for fascism.
I hear it’s genetic, and you’re showing all the symptoms.

By: gardensa

gardensa — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 05:44:41 +0000

Most of these tragedies have little or nothing to do with diagnosable mental illnesses. Abraham Lincoln and Winston Churchill had severe mental illnesses, so without medication (they had none) they shouldn’t have been trusted to save the U.S. and Britain, respectively?
There is currently no way to tell with any accuracy WHO will act out against others, and really, it is more of a symptom of anger problems or sociopathy that causes these things, and those are not mental illnesses, really.
The whole “let’s force those crazies to take their pills” is a knee-jerk response to a problem that is very difficult to understand or solve. People with mental illness cause no more serious crime than people without mental illness, unless you start factoring in substance abuse. It would make more sense to lock up all men in the world, because they cause all the violent crime, than it would make sense to forcibly medicate mentally ill women. I’m not advocating either, I’m just saying your response is extreme and based on faulty information. Also, some of the mental illness drugs have DEATH as a side-effect in some people, you can’t morally justify giving out these drugs as a preventive measure. Others of these pills cause extreme obesity or disfiguring involuntary facial movements. Etc.

By: Question Addict

Question Addict — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 05:32:25 +0000

If this were to become law, I see HSing becoming more popular.

By: Laxer

Laxer — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 05:27:39 +0000

It makes sense. If we make kids get shots and physicals to make sure they are healthy and wont get anyone sick. Why not make sure they are mentally stable to. My thoughts is it is hard to tell when someone is ready to mentally break. Some of these incidents were caused by students who others thought seemed normal. Therefore, these screenings would do nothing more than segregate those who are not acceptable by societies view. I don’t like the idea, but it might come down to it.